Cybersecurity control evidence library
Define what a control or security process should leave behind as an operating record: source, owner, decision, action, verification and review history.
Make operating effectiveness easier to inspect
These pages describe practical evidence objects, not audit opinions. The applicable evidence standard depends on your control objective, scope, regulator, contract and assurance method.
Incident Response Control Evidence
Retain evidence of readiness and execution: approved roles and playbooks, exercise results, incident declaration and severity, ownership, decision timelines, response tasks, communications, preserved artefacts, custody records, containment and recovery actions, post-incident findings and tracked remediation. Evidence should show what happened, who acted, when, why and what was verified afterward.
Open evidence model →Control evidenceLogging and Monitoring Control Evidence
Evidence should connect source inventory to ingestion, usable event records, review or detection activity, triage, incident escalation and remediation. A screenshot of a dashboard is weak evidence if it cannot show which source generated the data, whether ingestion was healthy, how the signal was evaluated and what action followed.
Open evidence model →Control evidenceVulnerability Management Control Evidence
Retain the finding, affected asset and owner, technical severity, exploitability and exposure context, treatment decision, due date, exception rationale where applicable, remediation action and closure verification. Evidence should make it possible to explain why one vulnerability was treated before another and whether the chosen treatment actually occurred.
Open evidence model →Framework mappings
Start with NIST or CISA guidance, then use these evidence pages to identify the records that can support review.
View mappingsEvidence Registry
Separate public Cybatar product claims from implementation-specific evidence and assumptions.
Open registry